Obstacles to Dayton
The main obstacle in implementing the Dayton-Paris accord is the
refusal of President Karadzic and General Mladic to appear before the
Hague Tribunal.
The Dayton agreement contains some fundamental flaws from its very inception. Simultaneously, the list of developments practically obstructing it is long, and includes limitations on the freedom of movement imposed by all sides, continuing presence of large numbers of foreign Islamic fighters, refusal of Croat and Muslim forces to release all POWs, and the blatant human rights violations in the Serbian Sarajevo districts recently handed over to Muslim administration. Most importantly, the much advertised "cornerstone of the Dayton accord", the Muslim-Croat Federation, remains as fictitious as ever; lacking an immediate anti-Serb military agenda, it is very likely to stay that way, which does not bode well for the peace accord in general.
Testing the letter and spirit of Dayton in Mostar: Serbs unable to return, Muslims and Croats unable to live together
Serbs fleeing ancestral homes in Sarajevo, just prior to transfer of rule.
In the words of Gen. Jean Rene Bachelet, Commander of the French Blue Helmets,
they "could opt either for coffins or suitcases".
"The United States said it has
'extremely disturbing reports' of the possible complicity of Bosnian
government officials in what NATO forces say is a terrorist camp it raided in a
Sarajevo suburb.
Pentagon sources said three Iranians and eight Bosnian Muslims were taken into custody. [...]
NATO said it contained an 'extensive armory' of handguns, explosives and
rocket-launchers. Pentagon sources said there was 'clear circumstantial evidence'
the group was planning possible attacks on NATO forces.
'I think it's an abomination ... clearly terrorist training activities,'
[U.S. Adm. Leighton] Smith said. He cited a child's toy with plastic explosives in a detonator inserted in it. He said the device he was designed to 'blow a child's foot off' when stepped on. [...]
Under the Dayton peace accord, all 'foreign' soldiers were to have left Bosnia by
January 19, and the Bosnian government had given IFOR some assurance that no
more Iranian mujahadeen soldiers remained inside Bosnian territory.
Yet after the raid, one Pentagon official said, 'You have to assume the Bosnian government was aware of this operation.'
Pentagon officials said they don't know how many Islamic fighters from Iran and other countries are still in Bosnia, in violation of the Dayton peace agreement. One Pentagon estimate puts the number at about 100 Islamic mujahadeen, and between 100 and 200 Iranian Revolutionary Guards. "
"NATO RAIDS 'TERRORIST' CAMP IN BOSNIA"
CNN news report, February 16, 1996.
"[...] In the most damaging recent incident, European military intelligence
services discovered the State Department had given the Sarajevo authorities
information about Iranian covert operations which had been gathered in a Nato
operation.
The European intelligence services had wanted to stage a series of dramatic
raids on suspected Iranian training camps, similar to a highly-publicised swoop
on an alleged camp near the town of Fojnica in February.
The raids would have been aimed at highlighting Bosnian non-compliance with
the Dayton peace accord, which stipulates the total withdrawal of foreign
forces. This would have had the effect of diminishing political pressure on
I-For to take a more aggressive posture against the Bosnian Serbs and, in
particular, to arrest the separatist leaders, Radovan Karadzic and General
Ratko Mladic.
[...] The US government, on the other hand, is understood to be anxious to play
down the Iranian role, at a time when Congress is increasingly sceptical about
plans to arm and train the Bosnian army. The Bosnian programme has been held up
until all military trainers from Islamic countries have left.
The Europeans also suspect the US is either conniving at or turning a blind
eye to Bosnian covert operations in northern Bosnia - in contravention of the
Dayton pact.
A confidential Nato intelligence assessment in Sarajevo concluded: 'This
suggests that what is under way is a co-ordinated high-level effort to
cover up an ABIH (Bosnian army) covert operation that went wrong.'
European officers believe senior officers in the US sector had approved the
operation without the knowledge of the Europeans or lower-ranking US field
officers. [...]"
"SECRETS AND LIES IN BOSNIA"
The Guardian, June 13, 1996
by Julian Borger
"Many Serbs have fled the suburbs, fearing reprisals
against them as the city is handed over to the
Muslim-Croat federation. And United Nations
officials criticized the federation, complaining that
officials tolerate the intimidation of Serbs who have
chosen to remain.
'The Serbs who ... decided to stay are now planning to
leave the area, feeling betrayed by the international
community and threatened by the federation government,'
said U.N. spokesman Alexander Ivanko [...]"
"U.N. SAYS SERBS CANNOT RETURN TO SARAJEVO SUBURBS"
CNN news report, March 16, 1996.
"Hours before a midnight deadline Saturday, the Bosnian government freed 109
prisoners of war from a Tuzla prison, Red Cross officials said.
But the move only partially fulfilled the government's obligation
under the Dayton peace agreement.
According to the International Committee of the Red Cross'
earlier calculations, there were some 152 prisoners of war being
held by Bosnia's once-warring
factions -- 129 by the mainly-Muslim government and 23 by the Bosnian Serbs.
That would
mean the Bosnian government still has at least 20 captives. [...]
European special envoy Carl Bildt said via a spokesman that he
believed the partial release was unacceptable. [...]
Under the accord reached at Dayton, Ohio, in November, all
POWs were required to be released by January 19. Although
hundreds were set free, at least 152 were held back."
"BOSNIAN GOVERNMENT RELEASES 109 PRISONERS,
BUT FALLS SHORT OF DEAL, RED CROSS SAYS"
CNN news report, March 16, 1996.
"While plowing ahead with military tasks in Bosnia, NATO commanders and U.S. officials are increasingly concerned about a key underpinning of the peace plan: The uneasy alliance between Bosnian Muslims and Croats.
The Dayton peace plan divides Bosnia in two, with Serbs on one side and
a federation of rival Muslims and Croats on the other. Supreme NATO
commander Gen. George Joulwan said that NATO is "very concerned"
about the future of the federation.
"I think it's always been very fragile. It is one of our biggest worries. ...
That entity is very important for the long-term durability of
Bosnia-Herzegovina," he said.
The concern is warranted, U.S. officials say, because if the marriage of
convenience between the former enemies ends in divorce, it would spell
disaster for the peace plan.
The Croats and Muslims aren't getting along like
they're supposed to under the peace plan. In particular,
they're failing to work out promised agreements on
customs, military unification, and disbanding the secret
police. The International Committee for the Red Cross
said Wednesday that Muslims had given no evidence
that they would release the last of their Croat and Serb
prisoners. [...]"
"A TEETERING CORNERSTONE OF PEACE"
by Jamie McIntyre, military affairs correspondent
CNN news report, March 28, 1996.
"Those following closely developments in Bosnia have established that not
a single agreement or law in the Muslim-Croat federation has been
implemented and that widening disputes could lead to a total split and
the creation of three separate ethnic communities in Bosnia.
The biggest danger for the Muslim-Croat federation, the Council of
Europe has assessed, represents the recent revival of structures of
power in Herzeg-Bosnia which is nothing else but an attempt to divert
the federation, the Muslim side has also observed.
Some Contact Group representatives have reacted even more sharply, and
the High Representative for Bosnia, Carl Bildt, threatened with punitive
measures and assessed that the formation of the government of
Herzeg-Bosnia was illegal and unacceptable under the provisions of the
Dayton agreement which have clearly determined that the Bosnian-Croat
'creation' must enter the Muslim-Croat federation.
At the same time, U.N. spokesman in Belgrade Susan Manuel is convinced
that the choice of the new prime minister of Herzeg-Bosnia proved that
everything was running counter to the Dayton agreement that provided for
the putting into practice of the joint federation, created 18 months ago
at the initiative of the United States.
Manuel said it represented a direct blow to Dayton [...]"
"HERZEG-BOSNIA COULD BE THE CAUSE OF A
SPLIT IN THE BOSNIAN FEDERATION"
Tanjug news report, June 24, 1996.
|