 |
DESTRUCTION OF CULTURAL MONUMENTS
Marko Omcikus
Republic Institute for protection of Cultural Monuments
From the very beginning of bombarding until now more than once have
bombs fallen in the mere vicinity of the monastery Gracanica. As a
consequence there is a damaged facade on the church, cracked
dormitories and destroyed objects of agricultural economy. Two of the
missiles have fallen very close to the Pec patriarchy.
Permanent bombarding of Kursumlija damaged and statically jeopardized
three churches: Sv.Nikola, Sv.Bogorodica (12. century), Sv.Marko -
their environs are rather demolished as well. From the beginning the
monastery Rakovica near Belgrade has been a target several times as
well. As the consequence windows and roofs are broken, the static
firmness of the church and dormitories are seriously damaged, as well
as the buttress, while its fall would provoke sliding of soil towards
the church entrance and all objects inside. Due to the close explosion
near the monastery Novo Hopovo in Fruska Gora, flying buttress in the
church is being destabilized. Also a bomb fell near the monastery
Vrdnik in Fruska Gora. Drastic is an example of cracked and statically
destabilized cryptic church Sv.Petka in Vranje.
Towns Pristina, Prizren, Djakovica and many others in Kosovo and
Metohija are being systematically bombarded and their city cores are
being destroyed with all its ambient, cultural, historic values.
Cities in Serbia are the permanent target of NATO bombs, and buildings
of extinguished architectural values are being selected, some of these
having the status of cultural monuments. An example is the Royal
Airforce Command building in Zemun, in the very core of the city, an
authorial work of Dragisa Brasovan. Another work of the same author,
building of Banovina in Novi Sad was also directly struck. The
building of MUP in Belgrade, is an authorial work of Iva Antic.
The demolition of bridges in Novi Sad is the barbarity of its kind.
The bridge which directly connected the center of Novi Sad with
Petrovaradin fortress, or just Petrovaradin, didn't have any strategic
value, because its construction could bear only pedestrians and easy
vehicles. On the other hand, it had vast cultural value, thanks to it
Novi Sad with Petrovaradin represented a unique cultural area and
undivided cultural structure: museums, museum belongings, galleries,
art workshops, institutions for protecting monuments and others, which
were situated on both sides of Danube; this means that the only
strategy concerning this bridge was exclusively of cultural value. Not
even the certain elements of this cultural structure in Novi sad were
spared: Museum of Vojvodina and Archive of Vojvodina were damaged, and
the building of Banovina was directly hit, as mentioned earlier.
Bombs are striking village areas with their dwellings and economic
objects built in the spirit of national tradition. One missile fell in
an immediate nearness of ethno-museum in Sirogojno (luckily it didn't
explode). According to the latest information bombs are falling all
over Novi Pazar. Let me remind you the whole area is proclaimed the
world's cultural and natural heritage by UNESCO. Permanently bombing
occurs, and among the targets of cultural heritage, there are some
belonging to ambient cultural entity. The precision of missiles showed
by the technology of killing, proves that even the "imprecise" impacts
are part of this precision. The case with Aleksinac, the train in
Grdelicka gorge, the group of Albanian refugees, and striking the
centers of Pristina, Prizren and Djakovica, are obvious examples that
targets are not only military goals and economy objects, but civilians
as well, civilian objects and cultural inheritance. When it comes to
monasteries and medieval churches, a conclusion that they are not
damaged or with some insignificant ravages, would be wrong. Actually,
afterwards consequences are to be seen. The vicinity from 200 m t 2 km
causes concussions that endanger static of an object; especially when
we talk about missiles with cumulative power. Not only are these
objects endangered, but the future of frescoes is in question too.
Sonic vibrations divide fresco material from the main wall, so that it
can cause the whole fresco or its parts fall apart even after several
years. Also the chemical processes during the explosions may seriously
jeopardize pigments of frescoes.
We are most susceptible when it comes to medieval heritage, but beside
monasteries there are masterpieces of urban and natural architecture,
which represent most of the monumental fond built up in the latest two
centuries. Some examples were previously mentioned: Brasanov's
buildings in Zemun and Novi Sad, buildings in Nemanja's street and
Street of Knez Milos in Belgrade. But some masterpieces were
demolished in the center of Nis, and some other cities, but we still
don't have the precise information.
When we talk about the cultural heritage, definitely we can say that
it is on the target list of NATO aggressors, just as the National
library was in 1941. by Hitler's Germany. The difference is that this
time the tactics are not the same, because at the turn of this century
that wouldn't be popular with the worldwide public opinion, because
other libraries, universities and monasteries in Europe shared the
same destiny; but with "diluted" demolition and "missed" hits the same
goals are being achieved, and the whole damage so far isn't any
smaller comparing to the National library.
With this report we cannot say that this sad balance is completed,
because so far we don't have at our disposal all the information from
the terrain. Also it is very hard to ascertain what and how hard
damage is done when it comes to the future static stability of
medieval monasteries and churches, especially the frescoes in them.
The permanent bombing with no evident end, with all effects on
cultural heritage, more and more stabilizes our belief that it is
definitely aimed at our culture, history and remembrance of our
people, with the final goal of ceasing and forgetting the cultural map
of Europe and the world.
|